UnitedHealthcare’s (UHC) announcement of removing 1,700 procedures from its prior authorization list was generally well-received; however, some experts expressed skepticism regarding its actual impact.
Expert Opinions on the Change
Wendell Potter, a former vice president of corporate communications at a leading health insurance company, noted that many items on the list are low-stakes procedures. This includes minor skin lesion excisions and routine injections. He emphasized that removing prior authorization requirements from codes rarely utilized doesn’t significantly benefit UHC.
Potter also pointed out the absence of critical categories such as specialty pharmacy drugs and oncology regimens, which are central to the prior authorization debate.
Details of the Announcement
The 1,700 codes were highlighted in UHC’s monthly Network News bulletin, which stated that this change would affect around 30% of prior authorization needs. This reduction applies to various UHC plans, including:
- Commercial plans
- Medicare Advantage plans
- Community plans
- Individual Exchange plans
- Oxford plans
The bulletin acknowledged the burden of administrative tasks related to prior authorizations and expressed UHC’s aim to lessen these pressures to enhance patient care.
Assessing the Impact
Despite being a step in the right direction, Potter cautioned that the true impact of this reduction may be less significant than it appears. Since prior authorizations reportedly apply to only about 2% of medical services, the removal of these codes could shift a mere 0.6 percentage points off the total UHC claims volume.
Michael Baker from the American Action Forum highlighted that this initiative might meaningfully reconsider prior authorization, potentially reducing delays for some patients, yet he noted that only 2% of services require these processes.
Tom Campanella, a healthcare consultant, praised the initiative, suggesting that it would expedite access to care for patients concerning the specific codes affected by this change. Nevertheless, he stressed the need for transparency and expedited appeals for lifesaving procedures.
Call for Legislative Reform
On Capitol Hill, Rep. Suzan DelBene argued that while UHC’s measures are a positive development, they should not substitute necessary legislative reforms. She emphasized that voluntary commitments lack enforceability, advocating for comprehensive legislation to overhaul the prior authorization system.
Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered medical advice. Always consult with a qualified healthcare provider for any health-related questions or concerns.
Fuente: https://www.medpagetoday.com/practicemanagement/reimbursement/122871
Join the doctors who get the most relevant medical news, curated by specialty, every week — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.
